South African sports minister says USD 10 million not a bribe

Image
AP Johannesburg
Last Updated : Jun 03 2015 | 7:22 PM IST
South Africa's sports minister "categorically" denied today that the USD 10 million paid to former FIFA official Jack Warner in 2008 was a bribe for his help in securing the World Cup.
Fikile Mbalula, however, said he couldn't say what Warner did with the money, which South Africa claims was "above board" and meant for soccer development in the Caribbean region.
What happened to the cash is "another story for investigators ... We don't know," Mbalula said. "We can't account for that."
Mbalula repeated the South African government's denials that the country paid bribes to win the right to host the 2010 tournament, as alleged in indictments from the US Department of Justice.
South Africa's government and former president Thabo Mbeki first denied any wrongdoing in the bid process last week.
"We therefore wish to categorically deny that our country and government have bribed anyone to win the rights for the 2010 FIFA World Cup," Mbalula said today at the headquarters of the South African Football Association.
The Justice Department believes that USD 10 million was sent by South Africa, through FIFA, to Warner in three wire transfers in 2008 as payback for him and two other then-FIFA executive committee members for backing South Africa in the 2004 vote.
South Africa won the World Cup by four votes over Morocco, making the ballots of Warner and his two "co-conspirators" decisive.
Mbalula characterised the USD 10 million as an "above board payment" to help the game in the Caribbean.
Mbalula also insisted that the South African government had not contradicted itself after the emergence of a leaked letter from then-South African Football Association president Molefi Oliphant in 2008 asking FIFA secretary general Jerome Valcke to send the USD 10 million to Warner from South Africa's World Cup funds.
Oliphant twice specified in the letter that the implicated Warner be in control of the money.
"The letter leaked to the media, we don't know why it was leaked in the first place because that correspondence was above board," Mbalula said, denying it suggested a bribe was paid. "Criminals can explain a bribe very well. I don't know how bribes work.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 03 2015 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story