Trai seeks views on in-building access by telecom operators

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 06 2016 | 7:22 PM IST
Regulator Trai today issued a consultation paper seeking stakeholders' views on evolving a framework for in-building facilities to enable telecom operators obtain efficient access on reasonable terms and conditions.
"It is implicit that telecom service providers (TSPs) would require an access inside the building to install the telecom infrastructure or lay their cables," Telecom Authority of India (Trai) said.
While many infrastructure related issues have been dealt with by the authority in the past, there are issues related to in-building access that are still faced by the telecom service providers and therefore, remain to be addressed, it added.
Apart from seeking views on whether the market is capable of taking care of these issues without any policy intervention, the paper is also aimed at knowing how sharing of telecom infrastructure inside a residential or commercial complex among service providers can be encouraged.
Comments are invited by July 7 and counter-comments by July 14.
In-building deployment is currently done through commercial agreements between incumbent mobile operators and building owners, building developers or Resident Welfare Associations (RWA).
As such, the speed of deployment is often hindered by building owners/developers delaying the negotiations or requesting exorbitant rents.
"There is a requirement to evolve a framework applicable to in-building facilities to enable the telecom operators to obtain efficient access on reasonable terms and conditions. Failure to share infrastructure would unreasonably restrict competition," it said.
Trai said telecom operators are often forced to enter into agreement at the terms set by the other party, as they cannot leave places like malls uncovered from their mobile network.
Also due to restricted access to premises, the resident of the building cannot avail services of the operator of his own choice and his preference is limited to the TSP(s) who could get the access to the building after entering into a commercial settlement with the builder.
"Such restrictive practices take away the choice and flexibility from consumers which otherwise they have in terms of quality of service (QoS), tariff, redundancy etc," Trai said.
It added that competition not only helps in controlling prices but also forces the service providers to offer/maintain good quality of service.
"Any situation which may take away such benefits of competition is certainly a cause of regulatory concern," it said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 06 2016 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story