Two govt employees acquitted in bribe case after 29 years

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 22 2015 | 6:28 PM IST
Nearly three decades after they were charged with taking bribe of up to Rs 1100, two Maharashtra government employees were acquitted by the Bombay High Court which set aside their conviction by lower court.
Justice Sadhana Jadhav recently acquitted Ravindra Joshi and Narayan Mane on the ground that the prosecution "miserably" failed to prove its case against them.
The Judge was hearing an appeal filed by Joshi and Mane challenging a Sessions Court order of 1994 convicting them under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentencing them to five years in jail.
Joshi and Mane were accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 1,100 and Rs 700 respectively from an agriculturist in 1986.
The prosecution case is that the complainant, Ramesh Gurav, had taken contract for a project of Ujani Canal sub- division in Solapur district in August 1986.
He completed the work and approached Joshi, then an assistant engineer, and Mane, a junior engineer with the Ujani canal sub-division - to check the work and prepare the bill to secure payment from the Government.
It is alleged Joshi and Mane, after a lot of delay, prepared the bill and forwarded it to the Finance Department. When Gurav went to take his cheque, he learnt it was for a lesser amount. When he went back to the two and demanded bill for exact amount, Joshi and Mane demanded bribe.
Gurav approached the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), which laid a trap and nabbed the duo with the bribe money.
The two accused, however, told the ACB officials the money was not bribe but loan taken from them which Gurav was returning.
"Upon analysis of the evidence adduced by the prosecution, it is clear that prosecution has miserably failed to establish its theory that there was a demand of gratification. There is no cogent and convincing proof of any demand of gratification," Justice Jadhav said.
The court held that the prosecution has failed to establish that the amount received by the accused was in the nature of illegal gratification, bribe or demand.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 22 2015 | 6:28 PM IST

Next Story