CCI rejects plea accusing Google of sharing contact data with Truecaller

The anti-trust regulator said that it found no evidence of violation of competition law in the case

Truecaller
Ashutosh Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jun 27 2024 | 8:45 PM IST
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has dismissed a plea filed against tech giant Google which alleged that the tech giant abused its dominant position to favour Truecaller in the market.

The anti-trust regulator said that it found no evidence of violation of competition law in the case.

Rejecting the plea, the CCI in its order said, “Given the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Commission finds that no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against Google in the instant matter.”

Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, prevents big firms from abusing their dominant position in the market.

The commission in its observation noted that the allegation of the complainant was unsubstantiated and despite sufficient opportunity, the informant could not provide any evidence to prima facie establish that Google was giving preferential treatment to Truecaller.

“Based on the experiment run by the informant, it appears that users have voluntarily provided the contact details data to Truecaller. Therefore, the allegations of the informant that Truecaller is engaging in ‘unauthorised publishing’ or that Google has allowed any preferential access to Truecaller do not appear to be substantiated,” the CCI noted in its order.

The decision from the CCI came after a complaint was filed by Rachna Khaira, alleging that Google was granting exclusive access to Truecaller to share private contact information of the users with everyone while prohibiting other apps from doing the same.

“By doing this, Google is favouring Truecaller and distorting the market for caller ID and spam protection apps thereby providing a monopoly space to Truecaller,” read the submission.

Khaira further alleged that Google was giving preferential treatment to Truecaller because of their commercial arrangements wherein Truecaller is using Google’s cloud storage service and Google Ad service.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :GoogleCompetition Commission of IndiaTruecaller

First Published: Jun 27 2024 | 8:45 PM IST

Next Story