Delhi HC orders seizure of another 129 EVs tied to Gensol and BluSmart loan

Delhi HC restrains Gensol and BluSmart from selling or transferring 129 hypothecated EVs after STCI Finance alleges ₹15 crore loan default and risk of asset dissipation

BluSmart funding news, BluSmart revival plans, climate funds investing in BluSmart, BluSmart electric mobility investment, BluSmart Eversource Capital deal, BluSmart distress funding, BluSmart EV ride hailing, clean energy investment India, BluSmart
Bhavini Mishra Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : May 09 2025 | 8:21 PM IST
The Delhi High Court on Thursday ordered the seizure and relocation of 129 electric vehicles (EVs) hypothecated by Gensol Engineering and ride-hailing startup BluSmart to lender STCI Finance. 
 
Hypothecation refers to using an asset, like a car or stock, as collateral for a loan without transferring ownership or possession to the lender.
 
STCI alleged Gensol and BluSmart had defaulted on a ₹15 crore loan and were seeking to unlawfully dispose of the vehicles. The application, filed by STCI, under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, sought exemption from instituting preinstitution mediation. 
 
Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, in her order dated May 8, barred Gensol and BluSmart from creating any third-party rights over the vehicles. Citing an urgent risk of asset dissipation, the court-appointed receivers took custody of the vehicles and authorised them to arrange for their maintenance and charging.
 
“Further the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff (STCI) considering that the plaintiff may suffer loss if the possession of the vehicles is not secured and the defendant no.1(Gensol) goes on to dispose of the said vehicles in favour of third parties,” the order said. 
 
Gensol had obtained a ₹15 crore equipment term loan from STCI under a loan facility agreement on October 19, 2023 to acquire the 129 vehicles. 
 
The loan was secured through a hypothecation deed and personal guarantees from promoter brothers Puneet and Anmol Singh Jaggi. 
 
This is the fifth such petition in under two weeks seeking to restrain Gensol and BluSmart from creating third-party rights over its EVs. As of now, the court has restricted them from creating third-party rights over 619 EVs.
 
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Delhi High CourtGensol groupElectric Vehicles

First Published: May 09 2025 | 7:19 PM IST

Next Story