Statsguru: Skewed priorities in priority sector lending across districts

A report by the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister has flagged sharp regional imbalances in priority sector lending and called for a more equity-focused PSL framework

ss
Imaging: Ajaya Mohanty
Sneha Sasikumar New Delhi
3 min read Last Updated : May 17 2026 | 10:23 PM IST
The Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister has called for a revamp of the priority sector lending (PSL) framework, shifting focus from economic efficiency to social equity. Between 2020 and 2025, just 63 districts — 7.88 per cent of the total — accounted for 45.78 per cent of all priority sector credit, with outstanding advances in these districts totalling Rs 2.25 trillion.
 
State capitals and major industrial centres capture the lion’s share of priority sector lending, the report finds. The Himalayan states, the North-east, eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, and parts of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan remain systematically underserved.
 
Since 1980, the 40 per cent PSL target for scheduled commercial banks has remained unchanged. The 2025 revision lowered the target for small finance banks and urban co-operative banks to 60 per cent from 75 per cent (Chart 1). 
 
Among all sectors, the skew is sharpest in micro, small and medium enterprise lending, with just 11.5 per cent of districts cornering 67 per cent of flows (Chart 2). 
 
Micro and small enterprises overtook agriculture in PSL share for the first time in FY26. However, housing and education loans have decreased by 15 per cent and 48 per cent, respectively, over the past seven years (Chart 3). 
 
Private sector banks have led on PSL targets since overtaking public sector banks in FY22 (Chart 4). 
 
Gross non-performing assets from PSL more than doubled between FY16 and FY25 (Chart 5). 
 
The State Bank of India (SBI) and private banks hold the highest outstanding deposits in the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund. On Priority Sector Lending Certificates (PSLCs), SBI is a net buyer, while small finance banks and nationalised banks are net sellers (Chart 6). 
 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :StatsGuruEconomic Advisory CouncilPriority sector lendingMSME lendingBanking sector

Next Story