Public procurement order: DPIIT wants 'local content' calculation narrowed

The components include transportation, insurance, installation, profit, commissioning, training, and after-sales support

DPIIT, Trade
Asit Ranjan Mishra New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : May 02 2024 | 11:29 PM IST
The industry department has written to the Cabinet secretariat, asking it to do away with certain components of services in calculating local content under public procurement rules.

The components include transportation, insurance, installation, profit, commissioning, training, and after-sales support.
Including such services in the calculating local content is believed to lead to overestimating value added through domestic manufacturing. This allows companies to meet local-content requirements without necessarily indigenising production, which undermines the goal of promoting local manufacturing and production.
 
In the 16th meeting of the standing committee to review the implementation of Public Procurement (Prefe­rence to Make in India) Order held last month, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) had objections to the notification by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas dated April 26, 2022, which allows the inclusion of components such as the Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC), the Comprehensive Maintenance Contract (CMC), training, transportation, and other services in the calculation.

“The DPIIT informed that a proposal has been sent to Cabinet Secretariat for accepting to remove components of transportation, insurance, installation, profit, commissioning, and training and after sales services support like AMC/CMC as local value addition for suppliers offering imported products,” showed the minutes of the meeting.

The meeting was chaired by DPIIT Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh.

Queries sent to the Cabinet secretariat and the DPIIT didn’t elicit any response till press time.


The DPIIT has contended that such inclusion undermines the intent of the Public Procurement Order by making even imported products qualify as Class-I or Class-II local suppliers.

At present, a Class-I local supplier is defined as one whose goods, services, or works have at least a 50 per cent local content. This class of suppliers is given the highest preference in public procurement. A Class-II local supplier is one whose goods, services, or works have a 20 per cent local content but less than 50 per cent. A non-local supplier is a supplier whose goods, services, or works have less than a 20 per cent local content. This class is generally the least preferred in public procurement under the Public Procurement Order, unless there are no available Class-I or Class-II local suppliers for a specific requirement.

“Industry raised the matter with the government in the past. In some cases, the services component is as high as 40 per cent and the company has to add just 10 per cent local content to become a Class-I local supplier. Since the public procurement order is a Cabinet decision and not a law, ministries interpret according to their own preference. Greater clarity will help in avoiding circumvention of the order in letter and spirit,” a senior private-sector executive privy to the matter said.

However, representatives from the Expenditure Department of the Ministry of Finance defended the petroleum ministry order, indicating that it was designed to incentivise local-content growth in oil and gas projects in India. They noted the exemption limit of Rs 1 crore, as stipulated in the petroleum ministry order, was higher than the typical Rs 5 lakh exemption limit provided by other ministries.

The standing committee noted the Department of Expenditure’s views, agreeing that there was no need to align the exemption limit in the petroleum ministry order with the Public Procurement (Preference to Make in. India), Order. However, the committee maintained it would wait for approval from the committee of secretaries (CoS) regarding the proposed changes to the calculation of local content.


Decoding the stance
 
DPIIT says including such services like transportation, insurance, and installation could undermine the intent of the public procurement order
 
It may lead to overestimation of actual value through domestic manufacturing
 
Such inclusions can make even imported products qualify as Class-I or Class-II local suppliers

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :DPIITInsuranceSkill TrainingTransportation

Next Story