Former chief election commissioners Friday welcomed the Supreme Court order rejecting pleas to go back to the ballot system and hold complete cross-verification of votes cast using EVMs with paper trail machines, and said the present system of matching results was sufficient.
Delivering its verdict on a clutch of petitions, the top court said persistent doubts and despair in EVMs create distrust in the electoral process and reduce citizen participation.
Former CEC O P Rawat welcomed the apex court verdict and pointed out that the Election Commission (EC) had approached the Indian Statistical Institute in 2017, seeking answers on a sample of VVPAT-EVM cross-verification to ensure 99.99 per cent voter confidence level.
The ISI said a sample of 479 VVPAT count out of 10 lakh polling stations will be good enough for 99.99 per cent confidence, he told PTI.
The EC decided that one polling station in every assembly segment would be identified for EVM-VVPAT match. "The figure came to 4,300," he said.
When some opposition parties approached the Supreme Court, it increased it to five polling stations per assembly segment and the figure came to 21,000.
"Instead of 479, we are counting (VVPAT slips in) 21,000 polling stations. So, it is a huge improvement already," Rawat said, adding that as per statistics, any further increase would not help achieve a confidence level beyond 99.99 per cent.
Another former chief election commissioner N Gopalaswamy said if a person cooks rice, then a few grains are checked and not the entire quantity cooked.
Echoing Rawat's view, he said if one VVPAT count is enough statistically, then five VVPAT counts make it 500 per cent.
"If you win, EVM is blameless, if you lose, EVM is the reason," he told PTI.
Another former CEC, who refused to go on record, said courts have rejected pleas against EVMs on several occasions.
He recalled that at least 60 opposition leaders had met the commission just days before the first phase of the Lok Sabha elections in 2019, seeking a 100 per cent VVPAT count.
But the EC took a considered decision after holding internal deliberations and turned down the plea.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)