SC heat on states over crop residue burning, questions efficacy of odd-even

Directs Delhi, 4 neighbouring states to stop it immediately

Pollution
Tourists visit the Taj Mahal in Agra amid dense smog. The Supreme Court, while referring to rising health-related issues due to alarming levels of air pollution, said on Tuesday, “We cannot let people die because of this”
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : Nov 07 2023 | 11:20 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Tuesday raised an alarm over the worsening air quality in Delhi, saying the Delhi government’s “odd-even” scheme for containing it was mere “optics”, and it directed five states, including Delhi, to stop stubble burning.

Under the odd-even scheme, vehicles with licence-plate numbers ending in an even digit are allowed to operate on even dates (such as November 8), while those ending in odd digits can run on odd dates.

“You have said that you have imposed alternative cars (even-odd). Did it succeed earlier? These are all optics; this is the problem,” Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul told the Delhi government.
 
The court directed the governments of Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Delhi to take steps to immediately stop stubble burning by farmers. The court has asked the chief secretaries of these states to meet on November 8 and submit a report by November 10. It said the responsibility for preventing crop burning would be on the station house officers, directors general of police, and chief secretaries of these states.

“We want it (stubble burning) stopped. We don’t know how you do it, it’s your job. Something has to be done immediately,” Justice Kaul told Advocate General (AG) of Punjab Gurminder Singh.

The court, while taking into consideration the submission of Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, who is Amicus Curiae (friend of the court), said the odd-even scheme was unscientific.

“To get over this situation we had suggested orange tags for diesel vehicles and blue tags for CNG (compressed natural gas) and petrol vehicles. It has been rolled out. Now, all the cars have hologram stickers on the dashboard, (by which) you can identify whether the car is a diesel or a petrol car. More scientifically, it would be to ban orange stickers (cars) rather than banning CNG cars,” Singh said.

Singh had suggested the state should impose restrictions on vehicles based on colour-coded stickers instead of the odd-even rule.

“Learned Amicus Aparajita Singh points out that in order to control vehicular pollution, the colour-coded sticker was envisaged … it appears that the same has been implemented only by the Delhi government while it has to be implemented even by the adjacent states. No compliance report has been filed. The states (have) to obtain instructions. It is thus suggested that the Delhi government is seeking to impose restrictions on the basis of ‘odd-even’. Singh submits that it is really an unscientific manner and … instead vehicles with orange stickers can be banned,” the Bench, comprising Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, observed.

The court told the Delhi government to report to it on the restrictions imposed based on colour-coded stickers.

It also said while the colour-coded scheme had been implemented by the Delhi government, it shall be done by the adjacent states as well.

The Court observed there might be ‘n’ number of taxis in Delhi that had registrations in different states. It told the Delhi government to ensure that only taxis registered in Delhi ply in the city.

The court has directed the government to place before it how the environment compensation charge has been utilised.


Stubble burning

The court told the Delhi government to ensure that municipal solid waste was not burnt in the city during the open as it happened.

Meanwhile, the Punjab AG, pointing out that farmers burnt stubble due to their poor financial conditions, suggested the Centre provide subsidies to provide the required facilities.

“It is his suggestion that an endeavour should be made and an alternative solution is provided free of cost ... He simultaneously states that the central government can bear 50 per cent of this cost (of the required facilities) and we do believe when the Centre provides so many other subsidies, there is no reason why this cost should not be borne,” the Bench noted.

The AG suggested paddy cultivation (in Punjab) be phased out and the Centre consider giving minimum support prices for other crops.


*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Stubble burningSupreme Courtair pollution

First Published: Nov 07 2023 | 9:34 PM IST

Next Story