Delhi HC seeks Patanjali stand on lawsuit by Dabur over 'disparaging' ad

The court also issued notice on an application seeking an interim relief and posted the hearing on January 30

Patanjali
Delhi High Court has sought Patanjali Ayurved's stand on a lawsuit by Dabur over advertisements. (Photo Shutterstock)
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 26 2024 | 2:29 PM IST

The Delhi High Court has sought Patanjali Ayurved's stand on a lawsuit by Dabur over advertisements allegedly disparaging its product Chyawanprash.

On December 24, Justice Mini Pushkarna issued summons on the lawsuit to the defendants -- Patanjali Ayurved and Patanjali Foods Ltd -- for a reply in the matter. 

ALSO READ: Dabur sues Patanjali Ayurved over 'disparaging' Chyawanprash advertisement 

"Accordingly, let the plaint be registered as suit. Issue summons.. Let the written statement be filed by the defendants within thirty days from today," the order said.

Dabur alleged that while promoting Patanjali Special Chyawanprash, fallacious and deliberate imputations were made, which defamed its product Dabur Chyawanprash -- a market leader with a share of more than 60 per cent.

The court also issued notice on an application seeking an interim relief and posted the hearing on January 30.

The plea said in the advertisements, the defendants have claimed only Patanjali Special Chyawanprash was the "original" and therefore "special" besides being "shreshtham/sarv-shreshth" or the best Chyawanprash, made according to the "charak, sushrut, dhanwantari, chyawan sage tradition" and other manufacturers had no such knowledge and were therefore ordinary.

"In essence, the defendants make a brazen claim in the impugned TVC and in the impugned print ad that only the Ayurvedic book used by the defendants is the 'original method' or formulae to make Chyawanprash, thereby rubbishing other Ayurvedic books 'stipulated' in the first schedule of the D&C Act (Drugs and Cosmetics)," the lawsuit said.

The plea therefore sought a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from televising the advertisements or in any other manner disparaging the plaintiff's goodwill and reputation apart from its product "Chyawanprash - Dabur Chyawanprash".

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Delhi High CourtPatanjali AyurvedPatanjaliDabur

First Published: Dec 26 2024 | 2:29 PM IST

Next Story