Ghaziabad lawyers' strike enters second day, thousands of cases delayed

On October 29, a clash erupted between police and lawyers at the Ghaziabad district court in Uttar Pradesh following a heated argument between a judge and a lawyer

Justice, judge
The disruption is affecting cases across all these judicial bodies. | Representative Photo
Press Trust of India Ghaziabad
2 min read Last Updated : Nov 05 2024 | 9:03 PM IST

Bar Associations in Ghaziabad held separate sit-ins over the recent police baton charge against them in the district judge's court as the strike by city advocates continued for the second day on Tuesday.

All four entry gates of the court were locked by the protesting lawyers, allowing only one gate to remain open exclusively for judges, magistrates, and judicial staff.

"Litigants arriving at the district court had to navigate a detour, with approximately 12,000 cases postponed due to the strike," according to a senior judicial officer who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

On October 29, a clash erupted between police and lawyers at the Ghaziabad district court in Uttar Pradesh following a heated argument between a judge and a lawyer.

On Tuesday, both the Bar Association of Ghaziabad and the District Bar Association were participating in the strike, holding separate sit-ins within the court compound to demand the suspension of District Judge Anil Kumar and disciplinary action against the police officers involved in the baton charge incident.

"The court resumed after Diwali on Monday, and judicial officers took their seats, but no lawyers appeared for cases," said Nahar Singh Yadav, former president of the Bar Association.

He added that Modinagar, Loni and Sadar Tehsil Bar Associations also joined the strike, abstaining from judicial work since Monday.

Currently, Ghaziabad district has 72 judicial officers presiding over the district and sessions court, additional district judges' court, magistrates' court, chief judicial magistrate's court, CBI court, family court, POCSO court, and MV Act court.

"The disruption is affecting cases across all these judicial bodies," senior advocate Sudhir Tyagi said.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :LawyersStrikeCourts

First Published: Nov 05 2024 | 9:03 PM IST

Next Story