SC modifies 2022 order, removes ban on development activities around ESZs

The apex court's decision was announced after a three-judge bench, headed by Justice BR Gavai, revised their previous ruling

Supreme Court
Supreme Court
BS Web Team New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 26 2023 | 8:44 PM IST
Supreme Court on Wednesday revised its 2022 order which stated that each protected forest such as national parks and wildlife sanctuaries must have an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of one kilometre. 

The apex court's decision was announced after a three-judge bench, headed by Justice BR Gavai, revised their previous ruling. The court was hearing the Central government's plea, which argued that if the directions aren't modified, severe hardship would be inflicted upon the millions of people living around ESZ.

The government in its plea said that it has already issued guidelines of ESZs in February 2011, around national parks and wildlife sanctuaries which were framed after consulting the National Board for Wildlife and hence, was seeking the modification of the June 3 last year court order on the demarcation of such zones.

Besides the demarcation of ESZ, mining within such parks and sanctuaries across the nation was also banned, according to the 2022 order.

A three-judge bench was of the opinion that hat mining within a national park, a wildlife sanctuary, and within an area of one kilometre from their boundary shall not be permissible as it would be hazardous for wildlife. Justice Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol, further added that the 2022 ban will not apply in those situations where the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has issued notifications.

The bench also added that the ban will not be enforced in those ESZs that are located on inter-state borders or have common boundaries.

The Centre has been directed to give wide publicity be given to the draft notification issued by it so that all persons interested have adequate knowledge about the concerned matter, observed the bench.

The top court in 2022, issued a slew of directions and said, "The role of the State cannot be confined to that of a facilitator or generator of economic activities for immediate upliftment of the fortunes of the State."

No permanent structure will be allowed within such ESZ, the court ordered.

(With inputs from agencies)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtDevelopmentnational parkwildlifeBS Web Reports

First Published: Apr 26 2023 | 8:44 PM IST

Next Story