SC declines urgent hearing on plea against MCD order to round up stray dogs

The Supreme Court, on August 11, ordered the authorities in Delhi-NCR to start removing stray dogs from all localities 'at the earliest' and relocate them to shelters

Dogs, Stray dogs, Street Dogs, Dog
The Supreme Court had earlier ordered the creation of shelters with an initial capacity of 5,000 dogs within eight weeks.(Photo: PTI)
Rahul Goreja New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 21 2025 | 1:19 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea challenging a notification issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) regarding the rounding up of stray dogs, reported news agency PTI.
 
Advocate Nanita Sharma mentioned the matters before the apex court, submitting that the MCD notification was issued despite the court having reserved orders in related proceedings.
 
However, a Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi declined to entertain the request.
 

What's the case?

 
The Supreme Court, on August 11, ordered the authorities in Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) to start removing stray dogs from all localities “at the earliest” and relocate them to shelters.
 
The order required the creation of shelters with an initial capacity of 5,000 dogs within eight weeks. It also mandated sterilisation, immunisation, de-worming, CCTV monitoring of the canines, along with a helpline to report dog bites and the capture of the dogs within four hours of a complaint. 
 
A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, while passing the order, observed that the menace of dog bites violates the fundamental rights of citizens under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, reported Bar and Bench. The court also prohibited the re-release of captured animals on the streets, cautioning animal rights activists against “virtue signalling” and warning that obstructing municipal action would amount to contempt.
 
The ruling drew protests from animal rights groups and dog lovers, after which a new three-judge Bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria heard the petitions challenging it and reserved its order.
 
While reserving the order, the top court slammed the local authorities, stating, "This is happening because of the inaction of the Municipal Corporation. The government does nothing. The local authorities do nothing".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtStray dogsBS Web ReportsMCDDelhi-NCR

First Published: Aug 21 2025 | 1:18 PM IST

Next Story