“Ad mkt to GDP ratio in India among the lowest in the world”, screamed the headline featuring an interview of Sanjay Gupta of Google India (Business Standard, October 20, 2023). In his interview, Gupta mentioned that the ad market in India was only a miniscule 0.4 per cent of the country’s GDP, lagging even many of our Asian neighbours. From what I can recall, the number of 0.4 per cent has not changed in the last three decades. Why is the ratio low? What could be the underlying causes?
For one, Indian television advertising rates are among the lowest in the world. This is thanks to the intense competition among the multitude of channels. While premium properties like cricket get sold for eye-watering rates, they are often being used for driving subscriptions and overall channel affiliation. The same could be said of print advertising. In cost per thousand exposures, both television and print rates are among the lowest in the world, in spite of the fact that subscription rates are also among the lowest. The low rates may be a result of lower operating costs/wages and intense competition in the market for eyeballs.
The myth is that digital advertising is cheap. Wastage is low. Selectivity is high. In overall terms, digital advertising may be cheaper than traditional print advertising, but when you start applying filters the rates go up.
So one reason why ad to GDP ratios is low is our lower ad rates. But is there another, maybe bigger, reason?
In her column (Business Standard, October 24), Rama Bijapurkar commented that there are 10 times more local and regional small fast-moving consumer brands than large ones that offer great consumer value. The question remains, are they doing enough to reach out to the consumers? Are they advertising enough?
When my friend Ravi Chandra Mouli, a very successful metallurgical engineer running his own company that makes speciality products for the foundry industry, asked me if he should advertise in an industrial products journal, my first instinct was to tell him not to waste his money. Then I realised that he may benefit from this advertising if he can create a package out of it. After some discussion we came to the conclusion that an ad coupled with an interview both in the digital and print version would be beneficial. Add to this, if the publisher can offer copies of the magazines to Mouli that he can send out to his customers, prospects and suppliers, he will extract maximum bang for the buck.