You are here: Home » International » News » Politics
Business Standard

Donald Trump's lawyers decry impeachment case as political vengeance

Lawyers for Trump opened his impeachment defense Friday by strenuously denying he played any role in inciting the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol

Topics
Donald Trump impeachment

AP  |  Washington 

Donald Trump

Lawyers for Donald Trump opened his impeachment defense Friday by strenuously denying he played any role in inciting the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol, blasting the case against him as politically motivated hatred and part of a yearslong Democratic witch hunt.

Lawyers for the former president told senators that Trump was entitled to dispute the 2020 election results and that his doing so, including in a speech that preceded the assault on the Capitol, did not amount to inciting the violence that followed.

They sought to turn the tables on prosecutors by likening the Democrats' questioning of the legitimacy of Trump's 2016 win to his challenge of his election loss. When Trump implored supporters to fight like hell on January 6, they said, that was no different from the Democrats' own charged rhetoric that risks precipitating violence.

This is ordinarily political rhetoric that is virtually indistinguishable from the language that has been used by people across the political spectrum for hundreds of years, said Michael van der Veen, one of Trump's lawyers.

Countless politicians have spoken of fighting for our principles.

After a prosecution case rooted in emotive, violent images from the Capitol siege, the impeachment trial shifted to defense lawyers who made a fundamental concession: The violence was every bit as traumatic, unacceptable and illegal as Democrats say but Trump did not order it.

Van der Veen said the siege was carried out by people who had hijacked for their own purposes what was supposed to be a peaceful event and had made plans for violence before Trump had even spoken.

You can't incite what was going to happen, he said.

Acknowledging the horrors of the January day is meant to blunt the visceral impact of the House Democrats' case and quickly pivot to what Trump's defenders see as the core and more winnable issue of the trial: Whether Trump can be held responsible for inciting the deadly January 6 riot.

The argument is likely to appeal to Republican senators who want to be seen as condemning the violence but without convicting the president.

They haven't in any way tied it to Trump, David Schoen, one of the president's lawyers, told reporters near the end of two full days of Democrats' arguments aimed at doing just that.

He previewed the essence of his argument Tuesday, telling the Senate jurors: They don't need to show you movies to show you that the riot happened here. We will stipulate that it happened, and you know all about it.

In both legal filings and in arguments this week, Trump's lawyers have made clear their position that the people responsible for the riot are the ones who actually stormed the building and who are now being prosecuted by the Justice Department.

Anticipating defense efforts to disentangle Trump's rhetoric from the rioters' actions, the impeachment managers spent days trying to fuse them together through a reconstruction of never-been-seen video footage alongside clips of the president's monthslong urging of his supporters to undo the election results.

Democrats, who concluded their case Thursday, used the rioters' own videos and words from Jan. 6 to try to pin responsibility on Trump.

We were invited here, said one Capitol invader. Trump sent us, said another. He'll be happy. We're fighting for Trump.

The prosecutors' goal was to cast Trump not as a bystander but rather as the inciter in chief who spread election falsehoods, then encouraged supporters to come challenge the results in Washington and fanned the discontent with rhetoric about fighting and taking back the country.

The Democrats also are demanding that he be barred from holding future federal office.

This attack never would have happened but for Donald Trump, Rep. Madeleine Dean, one of the impeachment managers, said Thursday as she choked back emotion.

And so they came, draped in Trump's flag, and used our flag, the American flag, to batter and to bludgeon.

For all the significance the impeachment of a president is meant to convey, this historic second trial of Trump could wrap up with a vote by this weekend, particularly since Trump's lawyers focused on legal rather than emotional or historic questions and are hoping to get it all behind him as quickly as possible.

With little hope of conviction by the required two-thirds of the Senate, Democrats delivered a graphic case to the American public, describing in stark, personal terms the terror faced that day some of it in the very Senate chamber where senators are sitting as jurors.

They used security video of rioters searching menacingly for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Mike Pence, smashing into the building and engaging in bloody, hand-to-hand combat with police.

They displayed the many public and explicit instructions Trump gave his supporters long before the White House rally that unleashed the deadly Capitol attack as Congress was certifying Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Five people died in the chaos and its aftermath.

What makes you think the nightmare with Donald Trump and his law-breaking and violent mobs is over? asked Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead prosecutor.

He said earlier, When Donald Trump tells the crowd, as he did on January 6, Fight like hell, or you won't have a country anymore,' he meant for them to fight like hell.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Sat, February 13 2021. 06:37 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
.