You are here: Home » Budget » Run-up » Economy
Business Standard

New fixed subsidy for NBS fertiliser complexes may not be changed

Falling crude prices and low consumption of NPKS fertiliser could be precursor

Anindita Dey  |  Mumbai 

The Department of Fertilisers is likely to recommend a status quo in the rate of subsidy for complex fertilisers under nutrient based regime (NBS) for the new financial year 2015-16.

Read our full coverage on Union Budget.

According to sources close to the development, with falling crude prices and low consumption of NPKS fertiliser (Nitrogenous, Potash, Phosphates and Sulphur), the prices of these complexes have fallen across the globe. The recommendation will be sent to the cabinet committee for finalisation.

Besides, the ensuing annual may announce liberalisation of pricing of urea so as to bring it under the NBS scheme from the fixed price mode.

Under NBS policy which came into being in 2010 and replaced the old concessional scheme, a fixed rate of subsidy is announced on NPKS complex nutrients by the government on an annual basis. The fertiliser manufacturers and marketers are free to fix the maximum retail price at reasonable rates under NBS.

Urea unlike other fertiliser (potash, phosphates, nitrogen etc) has a floating subsidy component whereby the government subsidy to the marketers varies with the marketing price (MRP).

At present for 2014-15, prices of major complexes like Di-ammonium Phosphates ( DAP), Muriate of Potash (MoP), Mono- ammonium phosphates ( MAP) and single super phosphate (SSP) have been fixed at 12,350 per metric tone (PMT), 12,009 PMT, 9,300 PMT and 3,173 PMT respectively.

On the other hand, per kg subsidy for these complexes fixed for the year 2014-15 is Rs 20.875 per kg for nitrogenous complexes (N), Rs 18.679 per kg for phosphates (P), Rs 15.50 per kg for potash (K) and Rs 1.67 per kg for sulphur (S).

The NBS Rates are fixed taking into account the international and domestic prices of P&K fertilisers, exchange rate, inventory levels in the country etc and based on the recommendations of IMC constituted under the NBS Policy.

Meanwhile, official sources aid, the falling crude prices has an impact on overall fuel prices and thus it is conducive for bringing urea under NBS which is a long standing recommendation for rationalisation of the subsidy.

They explained that one of the reasons for bringing urea under NBS is the overuse of urea among the farmers which is degrading the quality of the soil.

In fact, in the presentation on ensuing Rabi season, the secretary of fettiliser raised serious concern on imbalanced use of fertilisers and continuously increasing ratio in the sale of urea as compared to potassium& phosphate.

Besides imbalance in fertiliser use, depleting soil organic matter, emerging multi-nutrient deficiencies, negative soil nutrient balance and declining nutrient use efficiency & crop response ratio are the major concerns in Indian agriculture.

The fertiliser subsidy paid to the companies has declined by about 41% to Rs 21,300 crore during the April-July 2014 as against Rs 36,000 crore paid in the corresponding period the previous financial year.

The government had increased the total fertiliser subsidy in the July at Rs 72,970.30 crore for the entire 2014-15 fiscal from Rs 67,970 crore proposed in the Interim . India imports P&K fertilisers in the absence of much raw material to produce these fertilisers.

The Economic Survey 2013-14 pointed out that the government and farmers are together ‘wastefully’ spending over Rs 8,500 crore on urea, as it is highly subsidised soil nutrient and therefore used instead of P&K fertilisers.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, January 29 2015. 15:00 IST