Dunlop Ambattur unit to resume operations in 6 months
May need Rs 15-crore investment

Explore Business Standard
Associate Sponsors
Co-sponsor
May need Rs 15-crore investment

| Ruia, chairman of Jessop & Co, visited the Ambattur factory on Wednesday, after his group recently bought controlling stakes in Dunlop India, Falcon Tyres and Indian Tyre and Rubber from the Manu Chhabria group for about Rs 200 crore. | |
| The Dunlop factory has been closed since mid-2001. Ruia said that the resumption would be full-fledged. Dunlop's Ambattur factory has a capacity of 46,000 tyres a month, and can produce commercial vehicle, car and tractor tyres. Dunlop also has a factory in West Bengal, which makes aviation tyres. | |
| The position in Dunlop's Ambattur factory was better than that in West Bengal unit, felt Ruia. This is on account of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) the erstwhile management had reached with the Dunlop Factory Employees Union. | |
| The validity of the MoU ended last December. Ruia said that discussions would have to be held with the Union to extend the MoU. Ruia would also have to reach an agreement with the company's creditors in the run-up to resumption. Dunlop India has a book liability of about Rs 600 crore. The asset value is about Rs 800 crore. | |
| Even though Dunlop India's production facilities have been dormant for some time, Falcon Tyres makes and markets some tyres under the Dunlop brand name. Ruia said that Falcon outsourced some items, and Dunlop's Ambattur facility could be used to source those items. | |
| The upbeat prospects for the automotive industry meant that Dunlop India would enter a market with healthy demand, he felt. Ruia forecast that in the first full year of operations, Dunlop would register a turnover of Rs 300 crore. By the fifth year, the turnover would go up to Rs 1,000 crore, he added. | |
| The Dunlop brand covers goods other tyres. The brand covers items of personal consumption such as apparel, tennis rackets and balls. Ruia said that it had come to his notice that the brand had been used without permission. "I will not permit that," he stated. | |
|
| |
First Published: Dec 08 2005 | 12:00 AM IST