Lay retrospective tax claims to rest: Experts

Image
Sudipto Dey New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 12 2015 | 12:42 AM IST
The retrospective application of capital gains tax on indirect share transfers will haunt companies till it is resolved through changes in the law, say tax experts.

The Rs 10,247-crore tax demand on Cairn Energy over the alleged Rs 24,500 crore worth of capital gains it made in 2006 is among 37 similar cases that were examined by the tax department since 2012.

Though the Finance Bill 2015 sets the deemed value that will trigger capital gains tax on indirect transfer of shares, experts say it is not clear about retrospective application. The changes introduced in the Finance Bill 2015 are applicable from April 1.

According to Milind Kothari, managing partner and head of direct tax at BDO India, the tax demand on Cairn Energy is legitimate. "If the transaction had taken place on April 1, 2015, the companies involved would have been liable to pay tax," says Kothari. But the retrospective application of the tax, introduced in the Finance Act in 2012, has not been dealt with legally.

Experts point out retrospective claims may not stand the test in international courts. "Under bilateral investment treaties any retrospective clause is perceived as a breach," says Kothari.

The government must make the law prospective from 2012, notes Vijay Iyer, national leader for transfer pricing, EY India.

"Since the government has not taken any steps to undo this amendment, the tax authorities seem to be persisting with cases where indirect transfers may have happened," he adds.

"This is not in keeping with the approach of tax authorities we have seen in recent months," says Sunil Jain, partner, JSA Associates & Solicitors. The tax authorities have not made any fresh tax claim on similar grounds from foreign and Indian companies since last July.

"There is no logical case to impose tax on internal restructuring where there is no alienation of assets to a third party," says Iyer. He feels the government must offer protection to genuine internal reorganisations.

Apart from seeking international arbitration, Cairn Energy can also challenge the retrospective tax provisions in Indian courts. This is likely to be a lengthy route for resolution, lawyers say.

"We don't want the uncertainty in the investment climate to return," says Sriram Govind, member of the international tax practice at Nishith Desai Associates.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 12 2015 | 12:37 AM IST

Next Story