Sterlite Industries, which holds the majority 51 per cent stake in aluminium major Balco, may seek legal recourse after a government panel turned down its call option to obtain the residual stake in the latter.
A three-member government panel, set up at the instance of the Delhi High Court for arbitration in the matter, on January 25 had struck down the Vedanta Group firm's call option terming it "a violation of the rules and regulation".
"Sterlite Industries, which is making efforts to acquire the remaining 49 per cent stake in Balco for about a decade now, may seek recourse to the High Court," a person privy to the development told PTI.
With the call option, Sterlite was looking at acquiring the remaining stake in Balco. Call option is an agreement that gives the buyer a right to buy some part of an asset at a specified price and particular timeframe.
While Sterlite, in a filing to the Bombay Stock Exchange, said that it would decide its future course of strategy, the company did not elaborate on strategy or give any timeframe.
When contacted, a Vedanta spokesperson refused to comment on the issue saying, "We are going through the award".
Meanwhile, the government would also seek legal opinion before proceeding with the divestment of its residual stake in Bharat Aluminium to garner the maximum value.
"We are studying the award and taking legal opinion before proceeding on BALCO. The next step will be based on legal opinion as to how to get the best value for the residual stake," Mines Secretary S Vijay Kumar told PTI.
During the tenure of NDA government, Sterlite snapped up 51 per cent stake in Balco for Rs 551 crore in 2001. As per the deal, Sterlite was slated to exercise the call option to buy remaining 49 per cent stake in 2004.
However, the process was delayed due to valuation issues. The Controller and Auditor General valued the residual stake much higher and the Attorney General even termed the Sterlite's call option as illegal.
Following the rift between the government and Sterlite, the Balco issue reached the Delhi High Court in 2006. The court had set up the arbitration panel.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
