There should not be any witch hunting: Assocham on Birla case

Says It should not impact reputation and credibility of businesses because these are economic assets

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 30 2013 | 6:57 PM IST
In view of the CBI filing a case against Kumar Mangalam Birla in coalgate, industry body Assocham today said there should not be any "witch hunting" as it impacts the reputation of businesses operating in the country.

"It should not impact reputation and credibility of businesses because these are economic assets. There should not be any witch hunting," Assocham President Rana Kapoor told reporters at a conference here.

"We should not have any setbacks on morale of businesses. We feel the country's business confidence should not be shaken," he added.

ALSO READ: Hindalco unlikely to get tapering coal linkage for power plant


The CBI earlier this month filed a case against Birla as a representative of Aditya Birla Group and his group company, aluminium maker Hindalco, for alleged corruption in the allocation of Talabira-II coal blocks in Odisha. They were allotted to the company on November 10, 2005.

"It is our endeavour to ensure that business confidence and trust is not eroded. We are on the threshold of economic revival, so don't want any speed breakers," Kapoor added.

Taking a strong note of the CBI case against Birla, Assocham had earlier this week sought Prime Minister's intervention to end the "environment of distrust" which had arisen due to "half-baked cases" against industry leaders, cautioning this could further impair decision making.

"We find ourselves in a situation where half-baked cases are being slapped against top leaders of the industry and retired bureaucrats based on perceptions, interpretations and mere inferences," Assocham had said in a letter to Manmohan Singh.



"We fear that more industrialists could be targets of the CBI probes which in all likelihood would not bring out any substantial evidence of any wrongdoing, but the problem is that the reputation of individual enterprises gets jolted," the letter said.

Parekh, who was Coal Secretary at the time of this allocation, was also named by CBI on the matter.

The Centre has been at the receiving end in the Supreme Court which has posed tough questions on why coal fields were allocated to private players without a transparent bidding process. It has also raised questions on the slow pace of probe by CBI in coal scam case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 25 2013 | 6:34 PM IST

Next Story