Add to that a white Porsche Cayenne. And then, there's a black Bentley with a VIP registration number to boot.
A Madeira Red Rolls Royce Phantom that could set you back by a couple of crores takes the cherry. Not to mention Fortuners, Volvos and VWs. In all there are 47 of these beauties up for grabs.
Also Read
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) under the watchful eyes of Justice RM Lodha committee would be putting these vehicles on auction on August 30. The auction would be conducted through the website of MSTC India, public sector firm.
The success of this auction might not be more than a little step in the PACL recovery process, which runs over a humongous Rs 49,100 crore plus interest.
The more difficult part is selling off the other assets such as land parcels, buildings and other properties, which lie scattered across the country. The regulator is staring at a multi-year process.
A slightly different form of sale process, which is underway in the Sahara India case has not had an encouraging response at least in the initial stages.
In the Sahara case, Sebi is constrained by not being able to touch some of the more liquid assets such as the Aamby Valley and the overseas hotels. However, in PACL such restrictions are not there, which could help faster realization.
It is important for the regulator to realise money from these assets and begin payments to the investors in these schemes, which run into millions.
A group of agents and investors of PACL had marched to Jantar Mantar a couple of weeks ago demanding refunds of the sums due. Coming under the banner of hitherto unheard of organisation called All Investor Safety Organisation (AISO), they had raised questions about the ability of the regulator to refund money to investors.
Some of the agents this writer spoke to were of the impression that PACL was doing its business repaying investors on maturity regularly and it was intervention by the regulator that has spoiled its business and put investors at jeopardy. They also cite the regulator's poor record in refunding investors in past instances when illegal schemes were forcefully wound up.
This kind of skewed logic has become the favourite refuge of many scamsters, who faced regulatory action, in the recent past. They forward this theory to gloss over their own wrongdoings in building an illegal, unregistered business activity. Middlemen and agents, who peddled these products and are facing the wrath of relatives and friends from whom they often raised money, have little choice but to parrot this theory.
One needs to look no farther than that fleet of luxury cars sitting Sonipat to understand the fundamental flaw in that theory. But, it is imperative for the regulator to call the bluff of the scamsters by repaying investors, before it is too long. For that, it has to sell those cars this month. Go, bid.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)