CBI going slow on chit fund probe, alleges petitioner

Image
IANS Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Jan 19 2016 | 9:57 PM IST

Alok Jena, the sole petitioner in the chit fund scam, on Tuesday accused the CBI of going soft in the investigation into the multi-billion rupee scandal.

Jena, who was here on a drive to mobilise victims of the chit fund scam, told reporters that Gujarat had the maximum number of victims of chit fund companies followed by Odisha.

The Odisha-based social activist said the Gujarat government had "deliberately bypassed" notices by the Supreme Court to submit details of the number of chit fund firms operating in the state, their stakes and inter-state links.

According to him, 27 people have committed suicide because of the scam since 2012 in Gujarat.

It was in a response to Jena's public interest litigation that the Supreme Court on May 9, 2014, tasked the Central Bureau Investigation to probe the chit fund scam.

Inquiries by the CBI had led to the arrests of Biju Janata Dal (BJD) MP Ramchandra Hansda, BJD chief whip Pravat Tripathi, Odisha's advocate general Ashok Mohanty and summons to 48 ruling party leaders, including eight ministers.

The social activist, however, alleged that the CBI has mysteriously gone slow after investigating officer M.K. Sinha picked up Saroj Sahu, the power of attorney holder of the bank accounts of the BJD and Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik.

He claimed that the same evening after Sahu was freed by the CBI, the chief minister left for Delhi where he reportedly met union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and after staying in a farmhouse for 12 days, called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

He said that following the meeting between Patnaik and Modi, the CBI's investigating officer Sinha was taken off the probe and it was transferred to the CBI technical branch.

After the Supreme Court's order, 44 chit fund companies are being investigated by the CBI.

Of these, the names of 11 companies, including West Bengal-based Saradha and Gujarat-based Astha International, were submitted to the Supreme Court by Jena.

"In response to the Supreme Court's directive, I submitted the names of only 11 chit fund companies about which I was aware then. However, the apex court has kept the case open leaving scope for any citizen in the country to bring to its notice the names of other chit fund companies which need to be investigated by the CBI," Jena said.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 19 2016 | 9:46 PM IST

Next Story