Ever wondered why air crashes happen so frequently even with the best of pilots flying state-of-the-art automated jets? That's because humans are poor at monitoring tasks, according to a NASA-initiated study.
No wonder then that a majority of air crashes can be attributed to human error rather than technical glitches.
"Our study really does suggest that vigilance is a very difficult task for people," said co-researcher Jonathan Schooler from University Of California-Santa Barbara.
Pilots have to constantly monitor aircraft position, speed, altitude and an array of other automated functions as they appear on a computer screen during flight.
"Extended uninterrupted monitoring can be draining. The antidote to that is interruptions that break up the monotony, but we also found that the interruptions themselves contributed to lapses," Schooler explained.
"And people will spontaneously mind-wander, and that can also contribute to monitoring difficulties. It's a trifecta of things working against effective monitoring," he added.
Schooler and NASA pilot Steve Casner teamed up to examine why monitoring failures happen even among experienced and highly trained airline pilots.
For their study, they asked 16 commercial jet pilots to monitor the progress of a simulated routine flight in which high levels of cockpit automation handled the tasks of navigating and steering the airplane.
The researchers found that the cockpit environment is busy enough that pilots were often sidetracked by other tasks, such as talking to air traffic control or configuring the airplane's systems, which curtailed fatigue.
But they also discovered that these pop-up tasks could themselves cause pilots to miss important events during flight.
Most interesting, Schooler and Casner said, is what happened when the pilots weren't interrupted.
Rather than focusing solely on monitoring the flight, they instead created their own distractions by engaging in what the researchers call "mind wandering".
All in all, the researchers found, pilots missed 25 percent of all altitude crossings they were charged with monitoring. That's scary, no?
The study appeared in the journal Consciousness and Cognition.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
