The re-promulgation of the land acquisition ordinance by the Narendra Modi government may or may not suffer disability on grounds of constitutionality but experts have raised questions about the action's propriety and morality.
"I don't think that it is violative of the constitution or law but it may be questioned on the grounds of propriety and morality of the government action" constitutional expert Subhash Kashyap told IANS.
But such questions are subjective depending on the perception about the government, said Kashyap, stressing that constitutionality and propriety or morality were two different things and they shouldn't be mixed up.
Also Read
However, activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan said that it was "totally an unconstitutional use of the ordinance power" as such a law can only be promulgated to meet an emergency situation and cannot be used to get over the lack of majority in parliament.
Prashant said the government's action was an assault on the rights of the land-holding farmers.
The view taken by both Kashyap and Bhushan finds support in the Supreme Court's five-judge bench judgment of December 20, 1986 wherein, speaking for the bench, Justice P.N.Bhagwati had said: "The power to promulgate an ordinance is essentially a power to be used to meet an extraordinary situation and it cannot be allowed to be perverted to serve political ends. It is contrary to all democratic norms that the executive should have the power to make a law ..."
It said that if the "executive were permitted to continue the provisions of an ordinance in force by adopting the methodology of re-promulgation without submitting to the voice of the legislature, it would be nothing short of usurpation by the executive of the law-making function of the legislature".
This would be "clearly subverting the democratic process which lies at the core of our constitutional scheme", said the bench while quashing an ordinance that was re-promulgated by the Bihar government.
President Pranab Mukherjee on Friday gave assent to the re-promulgation of the ordinance to amend the 2013 land acquisition act, a day before it lapsed.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
