_____________________________
Uttar Pradesh has a long history of craven bureaucrats. It began during the long rule of the Congress party when babus took orders from party officials. The bureaucrat seldom appears to have the wherewithal to triumph against his crafty political boss. The preferred approach among officials is two-pronged: forge a nexus with crooked politicians and enjoy the fruits of power. The second, but less chosen, option is to recognise the institutional deficiencies and then rely on one’s ingenuity to work the system for the sake of the people.
If the Akhilesh Yadav government is to be believed, Nagpal’s decision to demolish a ‘mosque’ wall that was being illegally raised on government land endangered her position, as her action could have led to a communal flare-up in the state.
However, the report submitted to the UP government by the divisional magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar rubbishes that argument. Political pundits say the incident was a god-send opportunity for the SP government to appease Muslims in the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabah election.
The only silver lining is the manner in which the IAS fraternity has come together in support of Nagpal. The Indian Civil and Administrative Service Association has raised the matter with New Delhi. The association seeks necessary safeguards in All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1969, for an officer. As per rules, the state government needs to send a report (on suspension of an officer) to the Centre which is awaited. The association is the central body of Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers which has at present has about 4,737 member (equal to the number of officers of the elite service).
Quoting a district administration official, The Hindustan Times reported that Nagpal had rubbed UP agro chairman and senior SP leader Narendra Bhati the wrong way by lodging an FIR against his close aide Omendra Khari in a sand mining case.
A video purportedly showing the senior SP leader claiming he got Nagpal suspended in "just 41 minutes". The video shows Bhati telling his supporters that he rang up Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav and party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav at around 10:30 a.m.; by 11:11 a.m., suspension orders were served to Nagpal. According to the footage released on TV news channels, Bhati accepted that he was involved in the suspension of the SDM.
Defending the UP government's action, Azam Khan, a senior minister, said: "Everyone has the right on nature's bounty. Loot as much as you can."
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)