CSK's plea challenging suspension: BCCI asked to file counter

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Aug 27 2015 | 6:32 PM IST
The Madras High Court today directed the Indian cricket board to file its response on the merits and maintainability of a petition filed by Chennai Super Kings challenging Justice Lodha Committee's order suspending it from Indian Premier League over the 2013 betting scam.
First bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice T S Sivagnanam directed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to file its counter affidavit within two weeks.
The court made it clear that all parties should adhere to the schedule with regard to filing of counter and thereafter arguments and adjourned the matter to September 23.
In its petition, city-based Indian Cements Ltd, owner of Chennai Super Kings (CSK), has also sought a stay on the Lodha committee's order last month suspending it.
Contending that the sanctions imposed by the committee were illegal and beyond the reference made by the apex court, the petitioner has said the panel also ought to have heard it before passing the suspension order.
Mahendra Singh Dhoni-led CSK and Rajasthan Royals were on July 14 suspended for two years from IPL following the 2013 betting scam involving their top officials Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra respectively.
When the hearing resumed on the petition today, senior counsel Nalini Chidambaram, appearing for Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB), said the petitioner had made serious allegations such as non-application of mind against Justice Lodha Committee without making it a party to the petition.
During the previous hearing, the court had allowed CAB, on whose plea the Supreme Court had directed probe in IPL-6 betting and spot fixing scandal, to implead in the case.
CSK senior counsel Dushyant Dave contended that the allegation of bias had been made only against BCCI and not against the committee. Even this was made out as an institutional bias (by BCCI) and not against any individual, he said.
He further contended that the question of maintainability did not arise. "It is for me to satisfy the court. It is not for the BCCI. Liberty is given to me and not to the BCCI by the Supreme Court."
Countering Dave, senior counsel A L Somayji, who appeared for BCCI, submitted that Justice Lodha committee report was binding on the cricket board.
The panel report was accepted by the Supreme Court and decision of the committee has come into effect immediately, he added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 27 2015 | 6:32 PM IST

Next Story