How much money has AAP govt spent on ads, asks HC

It also sought details from Delhi govt on advertisements issued by them in other states

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal along with his ministers wave at the crowd during his public cabinet meeting at Connaught Place's Central Park in New Delhi
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 29 2015 | 6:54 PM IST
Expressing concern over "blatant" violation of the Supreme Court guidelines, Delhi High Court today asked AAP government to give details of the money spent on advertisements allegedly glorifying Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).

A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath also sought details from Delhi government on advertisements issued by them in other states apart from the national capital after the Supreme Court ruling that taxpayers' money cannot be spent to build the image of political leaders.

"Having regard to the fact that the said directions are operative and enforceable under the Constitution and keeping in view the specific averments in the writ petition supported by material available on record with regard to the various advertisements issued by Respondent No.2 (Delhi government) through the print and electronic media in violation of the direction of the Supreme Court.

ALSO READ: HC refrains from granting interim stay on AAP's latest ad


"Delhi government is directed to file its response by August 3, 2015, positively meeting all the allegations made in the petition. It shall also furnish the details of the amounts spent and the source of the expenditure for the government's advertisement by print and electronic media after May 13, 2015, judgement of the Supreme Court..." the court said, adding that the "act of the Delhi government is in contravention" of the apex court judgement.

"Whatever said in the Supreme Court judgement is binding upon the everyone," the court said, adding that "how you are spending money in other states like Chennai, Mumbai...".

The bench also asked the Delhi government's standing counsel Raman Duggal whether the money spent on the advertisements was from the party fund or public money.

To this, Duggal said the money spent on the advertisements were from party funds.

The matter has now been listed for further consideration on August 3.

The court's order came on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by senior Congress leader Ajay Maken, who sought immediate direction to restrain the "Delhi government from airing its recent audio visual TV advertisement and also its recent advertisement".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 29 2015 | 6:28 PM IST

Next Story