How to compensate dog bite victims, SC asks govt

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 18 2016 | 8:02 PM IST
The Supreme Court today asked the government to state the criteria for granting compensation to dog bite victims, especially when someone bitten dies.
"Which forum should the victim go to seek compensation in the dog bite cases, especially in case of death? What are the criteria for grant of such compensation from Chief Minister Relief Fund," a bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra asked.
The bench's observation came during the hearing of a petition filed by one Jos Sebastian whose wife, a MNREGA worker, was killed after she was bit by a stray dog.
Advocate V K Biju, appearing for the petitioner, sought a direction to the concerned authorities for grant of appropriate compensation to the victim.
The bench, also comprising Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, posted the matter for further hearing on April 5.
The apex court, had on March 9, asked states and civic bodies to take steps to sterilise and vaccinate nuisance- causing stray dogs under the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
Senior advocate Dushyanat Dave, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae, had said that balance needs to be created as there were instances of death due to dog bites.
Dave had said he was yet to come across news where animal-loving NGOs have come forward to help victims of dog bites and hence, the need of the hour is to strike a balance.
The apex court is hearing a batch of appeals, including those filed by Animal Welfare Board and dog lovers, against the decisions of some high courts including the Bombay High Court and Kerala High Court to allow municipal authorities to deal with the stray dogs menace.
Earlier, the court had said the local authorities have a "sacrosanct duty to provide sufficient number of dog pounds, including animal kennels/shelters" which may be managed by the animal welfare organisations.
Animal Welfare Board of India, in its plea, has sought that the central law, which mandates birth control of street dogs through strict implementation of the Animal Birth Control Dogs Rules, be followed.
The apex court had earlier declined to pass an interim order to stay culling of stray dogs by Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation on a PIL by advocate Anupam Tripathi, saying the killing of dangerous dogs and those inflicted with rabies should be guided by the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 18 2016 | 8:02 PM IST

Next Story