ICICI Venture Funds Management, 4 others pay over Rs 5.2 cr to settle case with Sebi

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 02 2019 | 6:25 PM IST

ICICI Venture Funds Management Company and four other entities settled with Sebi a case of alleged violation of norms pertaining to venture capital funds by paying a total of more than Rs 5.2 crore towards settlement charges.

They were also alleged to have violated Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices regulations, Sebi said in five separate but similarly-worded orders.

India Advantage fund III, India Advantage fund IV, Dynamic India Fund III and Dynamic India Fund IV are the other four entities besides ICICI Venture Funds Management which have settled the case.

Sebi noted that ICICI Venture Funds Management was acting as investment manager to India Advantage fund III and India Advantage fund IV.

In addition, it was also acting as sponsor to foreign venture capital investors -- Dynamic India Fund III and Dynamic India Fund IV.

The allegations against them included factual misrepresentation to investors with regard to registration status, inadequate information and lack of clarity in proposals for extension, liquidity and consent of investors.

Besides, it was also alleged that management of the funds was not in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the private placement memorandum.

However, pending proceedings, the entities filed settlement applications with the regulator without admitting or denying the guilt.

The settlement terms proposed by them were considered by the regulator's High Powered Advisory Committee (HPAC). The committee recommended the cases for settlement on payment of an amount totalling Rs 5,21,92,635 by them.

The recommendation of HPAC was also accepted by the panel of whole time members of Sebi.

Accordingly, the three entities paid their respective settlement amounts, following which the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) settled the proposed adjudication proceedings.

Sebi said that enforcement actions, including commencing or reopening of the proceedings, could be initiated if any representation made by them is found to be untrue.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 02 2019 | 6:25 PM IST

Next Story