Madras HC to pass detailed order on driving licence issue

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Sep 22 2017 | 9:32 PM IST
: The Madras High Court today said it would pass a detailed order clarifying the difference between driving without licence and not being in possession of it at the time of riding vehicles.
The First Bench of Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar said this while hearing elaborate arguments on the issue of carrying original driving licence.
The matter relates to a petition filed by All India Confederation of Goods Vehicle Owners Association challenging the insistence of carrying original driving licence while driving vehicles and sought to quash the same.
The petitioner submitted that lot of offences and punishments were already enumerated in case of violating rules whereas Rule 139 of Motor Vehicles Rules said that in case one's original driving licence is seized by any department an attested copymade by such department or by the concerned court can be shown.
Referring to the memorandum of the Director General of Police date August 24, the petitioner said that those driving without license would be prosecuted under Sections 130 and 181 of MV Act 1988.
As per Section 181, the punishment would be imprisonment of three months, he said while contending that the memorandum was not correct and improper and not sustainable in the eye of law.
Stating that the act does not contemplate any prosecution against a person carrying duly attested true copies of the driving licence and the other documents related to the vehicle while driving it, the petitioner submitted that driving without licence is a punishable offence but not carrying the copy (of the licence).
The Chief Justice, who sought to know why a person should drive a vehicle without possessing a driving licence, said Rule 139 only states under which circumstances you cannot carry the licence.
Even the Act or Rules don't mention about carrying photocopy of the licence, the judge said.
The Tamil Nadu government had on September 8 filed a counter affidavit in the High Court in connection with the petitions filed challenging the insistence of carrying original licence while riding or driving vehicles.
The counter affidavit stated that the original licence had become indispensable based on the recommendations of the Road Safety Committee constituted by the Supreme Court in 2014 to monitor road safety laws in the country.
The court had earlier on August 29 observed that there was nothing wrong in people carrying their original licence while riding or driving vehicles after some petitioners had opposed a government order in this regard.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 22 2017 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story