Among other charges, these developers are being probed for inserting one-sided clauses in favour of the companies and against the interest of consumers in the buyer agreements for sale of flats, apartments and other residential properties, along with other other anti-competitive practices.
A senior Competition Commission (CCI) official told PTI that certain details have also been sought from these real estate players, while they would also be given an opportunity to present their case before the regulator.
The CCI has pulled up many realty players in the past for violating fair trade norms, while a huge penalty of Rs 630 crore was earlier imposed on DLF. The order was later upheld by the Competition Appellate Tribunal as well and DLF has now filed an appeal in the Supreme Court.
Among others, information has been sought in the present case from Unitech, Omaxe, Puravankara, Parsvnath, Supertech, BPTP, Oberoi Realty, Amrapali, Ansal Properties & Infra, Prestige Estates, Tata Housing, Gaursons, K Raheja, Avalon, Purohit Construction, Aparna Construction and Amit Enterprises, as also from the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India (Credai).
Some of the companies have already submitted their written responses to CCI on this matter.
When contacted, a Tata Housing spokesperson said the company has filed its response to the CCI notice well within the stipulated time.
An Omaxe spokesperson also said it had received a notice from CCI "like all other major developers in India" and it has filed its reply to the regulator.
A Puravankara spokesperson denied that it was making one-sided contracts with consumers and not disclosing crucial information to customers including total common areas calculation.
CCI took up the whole matter following a complaint by Jyoti Swaroop Arora against Tulip Infratech and two others.
Unitech spokesperson declined to comment on the matter, while Credai did not immediately reply to queries.
