The government had stopped subsidy payment to GSFC in March 2013 as it found the company did not pass on the benefits to farmers for a certain period, which was challenged by the company immediately in the Delhi High Court.
The Chemicals and Fertilizers Ministry today issued a statement clarifying on reports alleging inconsistency in its decision to resume subsidy to GSFC.
The main Opposition Congress also on Friday attacked the Centre over resumption of subsidy to farmers in poll-bound Gujarat through GSFC, terming it an "election lollipop".
In an official statement, the ministry said the subsidy to GSFC on ammmonium sulphate (AS) was stopped by an order on March 18, 2013 on the grounds that the company had not passed on the benefits to the farmers.
The order also had directed recovery of subsidy already paid to GSFC with effect from April 1, 2010. GSFC filed a petition in the Delhi High Court against this order.
However, the company withdrew its case in March this year to enable the Department of Fertilizer to make recovery and take further action.
However, the ministry said, "the (fertilizer) department has released the subsidy in line with the orders of the High Court and in view of the benefits to the farmers since the Caprolactum Grade Ammonium Sulphate has been manufactured in India only by two companies i.e. Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore (FACT) and GSFC."
The ministry said the Delhi High Court in its order dated March 2, 2016 asked GSFC to approach the Department of Fertilizer to reconsider the matter and submit requisite data.
"After the examination, the FICC found that the company has not fully passed on the benefits during 2010-11 and made undue profits. However, the company had passed on the benefits to the farmers during 2011-12 and 2012-13," it said.
The ministry then constituted an internal committee of senior officers to examine the analysis done by FICC.
"The committee after examination accepted the analysis done by FICC and recommended that the amount of Rs 33.78 crore may be recovered from the withheld subsidy amount of the company for April 1, 2010 to March 17, 2013," the statement said, adding that the panel recommended to provide subsidy with effect from March 6, 2017.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
