The IRP, in its plea, justified raising the demand for more money from the flat buyers, saying it needed funds for installing fire and electrical safety equippments in 21 towers of the Silicon City project of the company, where over 1000 families are currently residing.
The IRP has taken over charge of managing the affairs of Amrapali after National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted the insolvency proceedings against the firm on September 4 last year.
"You (IRP) want to cheat them. This is open cheating. You cannot ask for more money from flat buyers. Your prayer is obnoxious. You can't raise the demand for money as all of them have already given their hard-earned money to the promoters," a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy said.
Observing that the homebuyers cannot be allowed to lose from both ends, it even questioned the IRP, asking whether it was in collusion with the company.
"Recently, a fire incident had taken place in one of the 21 towers of the project in which families are residing. When we visited recently, we were subjected to abuses and threats by home buyers. It will become untenable for us to work if there is no money. Or someone else can take over the control of management of the company," Banerji told the court.
He said fire safety equipments needed to be deployed, as out of 43 towers of the Silicon City project of the Amrapali group, 21 towers are occupied.
"Without money in the account, we cannot even install basic facilities for the people residing in 21 of 43 towers of the project. If we are not given money, then someone else should be allowed to take over the control," he said.
The bench said it will be "inconsistent" with the law that flat buyers are asked to pay more amount by IRP, even when they have paid the full amount to the promoters.
The top court directed the real estate firm to install fire and electrical safety equipments at all the residential towers within four weeks and asked the IRP not to obstruct the company from doing such work.
Senior advocate C U Singh, appearing for home buyers of the Silicon City, said the demand notice raised by IRP should be quashed as flat buyers have already paid Rs 2000 crore to the real estate firm for their homes.
He said one member each from three Residents Welfare Association (RWA) should be allowed to attend the meetings of company to represent the home buyers.
The top court is hearing a batch of pleas filed by flat buyers who have sought quashing of the September 4 last year's NCLT order and said the moratorium imposed under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is violative of Article 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
