"We will request the High Court to dispose of the PIL in three months and if that is not possible, then your (petitioner Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association) plea for interim relief (of restraining toll operator from collecting toll) will be considered," a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said.
The FNRWA has also alleged that the High Court did not decide its PIL filed in 2012, despite the fact that it was listed for hearing on 70 occasions.
The plea, filed through advocate Ranjit Saxena, said that various clauses of the concessionaire agreement between the Noida authority and NTBCL were totally in favour of the toll collecting firm which has already earned nearly four times of their total project cost.
"The present SLP has been preferred against the interim impugned judgment and order dated January 31, 2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in PIL vide which the High Court did not consider the Application for stay...," the plea said.
The FNRWAs, in its plea, said the agreement between the
toll operator and Noida authority was against public interest.
The petition alleged that the period for recovering the amount has been increased from 30 to 100 years by the Noida authorities.
It said the HC bench had failed to appreciate the fact that the money, which is four times that of the construction cost, has already been recovered by the firm.
