The field of 'tissue engineering' involves the use of a synthetic material as a 3-D support structure to help the cells grow and subsequently heal and restore the original tissue.
Tissues or organs of the body often undergo damage in the course of various diseases or due to external injury caused during accidents. Most of the time, these are treated using tissue or organ transplants from healthy donors. In some cases, devices (such as pacemakers for heart) can compensate for the loss of function of these organs.
Dr Kaushik Chatterjee, at the IISc's department of Materials Engineering, and his students investigated how and why do cells respond differently to 2D versus 3D scaffolds.
Chatterjee and his students attempted to make the Polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold stronger by the addition of Graphene (known for its high mechanical strength). The resulting Graphene+ PCL scaffold was found to be stronger than PCL alone.
"PCL is a biodegradable polymer and by itself is a very soft scaffold. This makes it unsuitable for use as a template for bone engineering," the research paper states.
Graphene based polymer nanocomposites are processed
differently while making 2-D substrates and 3-D scaffolds. The physical and chemical properties of these scaffolds differ depending on the kind of graphene used and the nature of the processing involved.
The research also revealed that bone cell precursors (osteoblasts) behave differently depending on the nature (2-D versus 3-D) of the scaffold. This difference in behaviour is due to the chemical difference in the method of preparation of the scaffold and the graphene used, which in turn affects the nature of the surface generated for housing the cells.
In this study, the addition of graphene increased the wettability (the degree to which a substance absorbs or can be made to absorb moisture) of the scaffold making it a better home for osteoblasts. They also find that cells in 3-D scaffolds have a compact arrangement similar to what is seen inside bone tissue, in contrast to the random distribution seen in case of 2-D substrates.
"The purpose of the scaffold is to provide only a temporary home for the regenerating cells. The scaffold should degrade slowly over time allowing for healthy tissue to eventually replace the scaffold.
"An ideal scaffold is one that is not only non-toxic to the body and non-immunogenic (does not incite an immune reaction from the body) but also supports attachment of cells and actively encourages healthy cells surrounding the damaged tissue to grow into the scaffold and repair the damaged area," said Sachin Kumar, lead author of the study.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
