Tony Blair 'duped' by Bush into backing 2003 Iraq War: Brown

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Nov 05 2017 | 3:13 PM IST
Britain's former prime minister Gordon Brown has claimed that his predecessor Tony Blair was "duped" by US President George W Bush into backing the 2003 Iraq War, according to a media report today.
Brown, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer when the decision to go to war was made in 2003, said that a top secret US intelligence report was not shared with Britain.
He said the US kept quiet about the secret intelligence report which showed there was "no evidence" that Iraq had access to weapons of mass destruction, the Mirror reported.
"Britain would not have invaded Iraq had we known about it," he was quoted as saying by the paper.
The report also undermined Britain's so-called "dodgy dossier" which claimed that Iraq could launch a biological attack on the UK within 45 minutes, the paper reported.
"We were all misled on the existence of WMDs," Brown writes in his new book, 'My Life, Our Times', which is being published on Tuesday.
"Given Iraq had no usable chemical, biological or nuclear weapons that it could deploy and was not about to attack the coalition, then two tests of a just war were not met.
"War could not be justified as a last resort and invasion cannot now be seen as a proportionate response."
Brown says he was assured by then MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove that Iraq had WMDs.
"I was told they knew where the weapons were housed. I remember thinking it was almost as if they could give me the street name and number where they were," he writes.
What neither Brown nor Blair knew was that the US Defence Department had its own report into WMD commissioned by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and delivered to him in September, 2002, the paper said.
The document revealed 90 per cent of US-held information on Iraqs WMDs was based on "imprecise intelligence" and relied on "judgment rather than hard evidence".
Brown says he had no idea that decision makers in America were already aware that the evidence on the existence of WMDs was weak, even negligible and in key areas non-existent.
"It is astonishing that none of us in the British Government ever saw this American report.
"As we were later to discover, the intelligence had not established beyond doubt either that Saddam had continued to produce chemical and biological weapons or that efforts to develop nuclear weapons continued," he writes.
As chancellor, Brown says his only official role was to find funds for the war.
The US-led multi-nation coalition forces toppled Saddam Hussain's government in Iraq in 2003 invasion.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 05 2017 | 3:13 PM IST

Next Story