The key lies in how genes involved in facial development and human facial diversity are regulated - how much, when and where the genes are expressed - rather than dissimilarities among the genes themselves.
In particular, the researchers found that chimps and humans express different levels of proteins known to control facial development, including some involved in jaw and nose length and skin pigmentation.
"We are trying to understand the regulatory changes in our DNA that occurred during recent evolution and make us different from the great apes," said senior author Joanna Wysocka, from the Stanford University School of Medicine.
The researchers coined the term "cellular anthropology" to explain how some steps of early primate development can be mimicked in a dish, and thus used to study gene-expression changes that can shed light on our recent evolutionary past.
For their comparison, the researchers focused on areas of DNA known as enhancer regions in human and chimpanzee genomes.
These regions contain chemical tags and proteins bound to the DNA that control how nearby genes are expressed.
The cells, called cranial neural crest cells, originate in humans within about five to six weeks after conception.
Although they first appear along what eventually becomes the spinal cord, the neural crest cells then migrate over time to affect facial morphology and differentiate into bone, cartilage and connective tissue of the head, and face.
"If we want to understand what makes human and chimp faces different, we have to look to the source - to the cell types responsible for making these early patterning decisions," said lead author Sara Prescott, graduate student at Stanford University.
Researchers coaxed human and chimpanzee iPS cells to become cranial neural crest cells by growing them in the laboratory under a specific set of conditions.
The researchers found that two genes, PAX3 and PAX7, known to affect snout length and shape in laboratory mice, as well as skin pigmentation, were expressed at higher levels in chimpanzees than in humans.
The study was published in the journal Cell.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
