"This kind of stimulation can improve cognitive processing in other brain areas, so if we stimulate the visual system, could we improve processing?" said Geoff Woodman, associate professor at the Vanderbilt University in the US.
"Could we make someone's vision better - not at the level of the eye, like Lasik or glasses, but directly at the level of the brain?" said Woodman.
Twenty young, healthy subjects with normal or near-normal vision were asked to evaluate the relative position of two identical vertical lines and judged whether they were perfectly aligned or offset.
The researchers then passed a very mild electric current through the visual cortex, the area at the back of the brain that processes visual information.
After 20 minutes, the subjects were asked to perform the test again, and about 75 per cent showed measurable improvement following the brain stimulation.
The researchers performed several variations of this experiment to test the effects of different intensity levels, current directions and electrode placements.
This third experiment confirmed that the electrodes had to be positioned specifically over the brain's visual processing centre in order to affect the subjects' eyesight.
The contrast experiment was notable because they found that the stimulation only improved contrast sensitivity at frequencies also associated with visual acuity, indicating that it was just the subjects' visual acuity that was being affected, not the contrast sensitivity.
Lead author Robert Reinhart, from the Boston University who conducted this research as a PhD student at Vanderbilt, said this finding had interesting implications for future basic science.
They found that the stimulation effects improved the subjects' vision by an average of one to two letters, though there was significant variation between subjects.
"We saw that those who came in with poorer vision, who might be on their way to needing glasses, had these big leaps, while others who came in with excellent vision showed no change," Reinhart said.
The study was published in the journal Current Biology.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
