Dispute over food GST: Gujarat High Court rules in company's favour

The Gujarat High Court has quashed a show cause notice sent by the GST authorities to a company asking it to pay 18 per cent tax on unfried or uncooked extruded snack pellets

The managing director (MD) of a famous restaurant chain in Tamil Nadu supposedly apologising to Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Coimbatore on Wednesday has triggered a political controversy. Even if the political part of the incident is
Representative Picture
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 17 2024 | 10:43 PM IST
Amid disputes over the contentious issue of goods and services tax (GST) rates on food items, the Gujarat high court has quashed a show cause notice sent by the GST authorities to a company, asking it to pay 18 per cent tax on unfried or uncooked extruded snack pellets.

A circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) in January last year had clarified that snack pellets such as fryums would draw 18 per cent GST.

The high court, while ruling in favour of J K Papad Industries, referred to an order by the Gujarat appellate authority of advance ruling (AAAR) that papad, including fryums, of different shapes and sizes, would draw nil GST.

The AAAR had modified the ruling of the AAR, which had held fryums would attract 18 per cent GST.

Meanwhile, the CBIC in August last year had clarified that the GST rate on uncooked extruded snack pellets is 5 per cent and this rate would apply prospectively.

The company, in this case, followed a ruling of the AAAR, because its case pertains to the pre-August 2023 period. The authorities, however, asked it to follow the circular issued in January last year.

The court ruled  that the tax rate only changed in August and before that the applicant was entitled to rely on the AAAR's decision.

The  latest GST Council meeting earlier this month had clarified that unfried or uncooked snack pellets would remain unchanged at 5 per cent.

Sandeep Sehgal, partner-tax at consultancy firm AKM Global, said this ruling has broader implications for the industry, emphasising that businesses should not face retrospective tax demands based on misclassification or misinterpretation of regulations.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Indirect TaxGSTFood billGST on FMCG

First Published: Sep 17 2024 | 8:11 PM IST

Next Story