e-buses with clustered-procurement programmes, is much tougher for e-trucks.
“In the context of credit profiles, the counterparty risk in e-buses is lower. In e-trucks, the counterparties are fleet operators or truck drivers, which increases the counterparty and delivery risk for lenders — that is a constraint,” said Vishal Kotecha, director and head – infrastructure and project finance at India Ratings and Research.
According to NITI Aayog, the main challenge is that truck and bus ownership is highly fragmented with most owners being small players.
“Since electric trucks and buses cost about two-three times as much as their ICE equivalent, the higher amounts of loan and equity make it difficult for small players to shift to electric buses and trucks. Financial institutions are also uncertain about the ability of small players to service the higher EMI. The near absence of reliable e-truck and e-bus performance data makes it more difficult for them to take lending decisions,” the NITI Aayog found.