Amid a row over alleged funding by USAID for raising voter turnout in India, the Congress on Thursday demanded that the Indian government should bring out a white paper on the US agency's support to both governmental and non-governmental institutions in India over the decades.
The Congress also dubbed US President Donald Trump's claims related to USAID as "nonsensical". ALSO READ: Trump claims USAID funding in India was to get 'someone else elected'
The opposition party's assertion comes after President Donald Trump questioned the purpose of providing $21 million to India for "voter turnout". "Why do we need to spend $21 million for voter turnout in India? I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected...," Trump has said.
In a post on X, Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "USAID is very much in the news these days. It was set up on November 3, 1961. Claims being made by the US President are typically nonsensical to say the least." "Even so, the Government of India should bring out a White Paper at the earliest detailing USAID's support to both governmental and non-governmental institutions in India over the decades," the Congress leader said.
On February 16, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by billionaire SpaceX CEO Musk, listed items on which the "US taxpayer dollars were going to be spent" and the list included "$21M for voter turnout in India".
Also Read
DOGE noted that all of the items have been cancelled.
The list also included $29 million to "strengthening political landscape in Bangladesh, $20 million for "fiscal federalism" and $19 million for "biodiversity conversation" in Nepal as well as $47 million for "improving learning outcomes in Asia.
While signing executive orders on Tuesday at Mar-a-Lago, Trump had said,"...And $21 million for voter turnout in India. Why are we giving $21 million to India? They got a lot of money there. One of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us. We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

)