Kalanithi Maran moves Delhi HC against non-payment of Rs 243 cr by SpiceJet

Seeks attachment of promoter Ajay Singh's shares; SpiceJet moves SC

Kalanithi Maran
File Photo of Kalanithi Maran, owner of Sun Group
Arindam Majumder New Delhi
3 min read Last Updated : Oct 22 2020 | 10:57 PM IST
Kalanithi Maran, owner of Sun Group and ex-promoter of SpiceJet, has moved Delhi High Court (HC), seeking attachment of SpiceJet promoter Ajay Singh’s shareholding after the airline failed to deposit Rs 243 crore in favour of Sun Group chairman.

The case predates to 2017 and relates to a dispute arising out of non-issuance of warrants in favour of Maran, after transfer of ownership to Ajay Singh — the current promoter of SpiceJet.

In September, Delhi HC had asked SpiceJet to deposit an additional Rs 243 crore. The court had then said that if the amount was not deposited within six weeks, Maran had the right to seek status quo on SpiceJet’s shareholding. It meant the company would not be able raise new capital from the market through issuance of fresh shares or stake sale.

Since the amount wasn’t deposited, Maran moved Delhi HC, seeking restraint on Singh from transferring or pledging the company’s shares.

Maran had also sought attachment of Singh’s shares by an administrator unless the payment was made.
However, a SpiceJet spokesperson confirmed that the company has moved Supreme Court (SC) against the original order of Delhi HC.

“We have moved SC saying that the very basic premise under which Maran had moved court again despite a ruling from the arbitration was wrong. The company has challenged the interest obligations and rights,” said a SpiceJet executive, adding it expects the case to be heard by the SC soon.

Maran had sold his entire 58.46 per cent stake, amounting to 350.4 million shares in SpiceJet, to Singh, its current owner, for a nominal Rs 2 in 2015, after a financial crunch crippled its operation, leading to a change in ownership of the airline.

The two sides have since been locked in litigation, with Maran accusing SpiceJet and Singh of breach of agreement for not issuing him 189-million share warrants and preference shares, despite his Rs 679-crore infusion. He claimed Rs 1,300 crore from SpiceJet and Singh due to this.

The warrants, if converted into equity, would have given Maran and his KAL Airways a 24 per cent stake in the airline. SpiceJet contended these could not be issued, as they did not get the BSE’s approval.

Subsequently, in July 2018, an arbitration tribunal ruled in SpiceJet’s favour, rejecting Maran’s Rs 1,300-claim for loss on account of non-issuance of share warrants.

However, Maran will be entitled to a refund of Rs 579 crore — the subscription amount he made for warrants and preference shares.



 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Kalanithi MaranDelhi High Court

Next Story