Berlin took the measure, one of the toughest in the world, after a surge in racist and incendiary speech online, particularly since the arrival of around one million asylum- seekers since 2015.
Under German law, Holocaust denial, incitement of hatred, and racist and anti-Semitic speech are illegal.
But critics warned that the prohibitive fines would stifle legitimate free speech by prompting online giants like Twitter and Facebook to excessively delete and censor posts as a precaution.
But Justice Minister Heiko Maas argued that "freedom of opinion ends where criminal law begins".
"Death threats and insults, incitement to hate or (Holocaust denial) are not part of freedom of expression -- rather, they are attacks against other people's freedom of opinion," Maas said in a statement before the bill passed the lower house on the last day of the session.
"They are intended to intimidate and mute others," he said.
Under the new law, companies like Twitter and Facebook would have 24 hours to remove posts that openly violate German law after they are flagged by users.
The government emphasised that the heavy fines would be imposed only if companies systematically failed to follow the new directive, and not for individual cases.
Social media companies pledged in 2015 to examine and remove within 24 hours any flagged hateful comments, but a government report in April tracking progress on this front found that not enough had been done.
"The online platforms are not taking adequate action. Our experience has clearly shown that without political pressure, the social networks will unfortunately not budge," Maas said.
Google's YouTube video sharing platform fared far better, with a rate of 90 per cent, according to a government study cited by the minister.
Beyond hate speech, the legislation also covers other illegal content, including child pornography and terror- related postings.
A civil society umbrella called Alliance for Freedom of Opinion published a statement opposing the bill.
"Service providers should not be entrusted with the government's job of deciding whether content is legal," said the group, which includes Reporters without Borders and the federations of German startups and digital companies.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
