Hearing the petition by one Kumar of Narasingam, the owner of the building, Justice Nisha Bhanu directed the Advocate Commissioner to find out if the petitioner's shop had been located as per rules.
The judge asked the AC to file a report and posted the matter for hearing after two weeks.
The petitioner submitted that on being approached by the TASMAC he had spent Rs five lakh in constructing the building for the shop.
As he refused, they had instigated some local people to organise an agitation against the location of the shop, he claimed adding it had been built as per rules.
The government would be losing if the revenue if the shop was not opened, he said seeking a court direction to the officials to open the shop in his building.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
