"If you look at pattern of other countries, typically the best time to carry reforms happens to be in first year, especially first two years of a new government.
"And longer a leader stays in power, the more are the diminishing returns to power... So, in that way, first two years is sweet spot for when things are carried out by any government, because then focus begins to turn on getting re-elected," he told PTI citing his research.
Aam Admi Party swept Delhi Assembly elections and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party BJP could win only three seats.
On what he hopes from the government, he said: "I have no expectation of any great reform any more. I think that whatever big reform could have been done, should have been done in first year or may be in the first two years."
Stressing his point, he said even if one look at stock market prospective, 90 per cent of outperformance of market happens in the first two years of new government.
While he does not expect any major economic reform, Sharma said there may be some further liberalisation in FDI norms or changes in taxation front and "if we get lucky then we will get Goods and Services Tax (GST)".
Building further on his point that reforms should be carried out by government in its initial years, Sharma said "and if government comes back to power a second time, the odds are that in second term government does not that much energy that it had in first term."
To a query whether India's election calender makes it difficult to carry out economic reform, he said, "its an excuse" because during elections in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu no central issues were being discussed but only local ones.
