The counsel appearing on the behalf of the firm submitted before Metropolitan Magistrate Vaibhav Mehta that the notices (challans) were not properly issued.
Advocate Sushmit Pushkar told the court that the firm was contesting the challans as its taxis did not fall under the purview of the Delhi government but under the Centre.
Also Read
The court has now fixed the case for further hearing on July 23.
The Delhi government had issued challans to Kalanick, Uber India president Amit Jain and general manager for North India operations Gagan Bhatiya for alleged violation of the Motor Vehicles Act.
The challans were issued under the section of Motor Vehicles Act prohibiting soliciting or canvassing customers for taxis which do not have state government licenses.
Later, a city court had issued notices to them to appear before it.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)