Explore Business Standard
Explore Business Standard
The revenue stands at ₹ crore, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter *(QoQ) decrease of per cent from ₹ crore. This corresponds to a year-on-year *(YoY) decline of per cent.
Operating Profit stands at ₹ crore, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter *(QoQ) decrease of per cent from ₹ crore. This corresponds to a year-on-year *(YoY) decline of per cent.
PBDT stands at ₹ crore, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter *(QoQ) decrease of per cent from ₹ crore. This corresponds to a year-on-year *(YoY) decline of per cent.
Profit Before Tax stands at ₹ crore, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter *(QoQ) decrease of per cent from ₹ crore. This corresponds to a year-on-year *(YoY) decline of per cent.
Net Profit stands at ₹ crore, reflecting a quarter-on-quarter *(QoQ) decrease of per cent from ₹ crore. This represents a per cent year-on-year *(YoY) decline for the same year.
| Category | Q4 FY25-26 | Q4 FY24-25 | Change % | FY25-26 | FY24-25 | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | 24,236.30 | 22,504.20 | 7.70 | 92,624.00 | 89,088.40 | 3.97 |
| Expenses | 19,327.00 | 17,880.20 | 8.09 | 74,812.80 | 71,067.20 | 5.27 |
| Other Income | 856.90 | 1,217.40 | -29.61 | 3,899.40 | 3,909.40 | -0.26 |
| Operating Profit | 4,909.30 | 4,624.00 | 6.17 | 21,710.60 | 21,930.60 | -1.00 |
| Depreciation | 728.50 | 721.70 | 0.94 | 2,910.70 | 2,957.90 | -1.60 |
| Interest | 370.10 | 376.70 | -1.75 | 1,457.70 | 1,477.00 | -1.31 |
| Profit Before Tax | 4,667.60 | 4,743.00 | -1.59 | 17,342.20 | 17,495.70 | -0.88 |
| Tax | 1,146.00 | 1,154.90 | -0.77 | 4,266.50 | 4,540.50 | -6.03 |
| Net Profit | 3,521.60 | 3,588.10 | -1.85 | 13,265.50 | 13,218.00 | 0.36 |
| Category | Q4 FY25-26 | Q4 FY24-25 | Change % | FY25-26 | FY24-25 | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | 18,362.80 | 17,429.40 | 5.36 | 71,345.10 | 68,575.00 | 4.04 |
| Expenses | 14,430.10 | 14,124.20 | 2.17 | 57,674.90 | 55,407.10 | 4.09 |
| Other Income | 786.10 | 1,402.10 | -43.93 | 4,749.10 | 3,947.70 | 20.30 |
| Operating Profit | 14,539.60 | 14,323.00 | 1.51 | 18,419.30 | 17,115.60 | 7.62 |
| Depreciation | 348.80 | 388.50 | -10.22 | 1,418.20 | 1,501.30 | -5.54 |
| Interest | 291.80 | 253.70 | 15.02 | 1,095.90 | 1,001.80 | 9.39 |
| Profit Before Tax | 4,078.20 | 4,065.10 | 0.32 | 15,905.20 | 14,612.50 | 8.85 |
| Tax | 1,041.10 | 1,142.20 | -8.85 | 3,834.90 | 3,993.40 | -3.97 |
| Net Profit | 3,037.10 | 2,922.90 | 3.91 | 12,129.60 | 10,913.10 | 11.15 |
| Category | Q4 FY25-26 | Q3 FY25-26 | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | 24,236.30 | 23,555.80 | 2.89 |
| Expenses | 19,327.00 | 19,259.40 | 0.35 |
| Other Income | 856.90 | 1,008.10 | -15.00 |
| Operating Profit | 4,909.30 | 4,296.40 | 14.27 |
| Depreciation | 728.50 | 805.00 | -9.50 |
| Interest | 370.10 | 365.60 | 1.23 |
| Profit Before Tax | 4,667.60 | 4,133.90 | 12.91 |
| Tax | 1,146.00 | 988.90 | 15.89 |
| Net Profit | 3,521.60 | 3,145.00 | 11.97 |
| Category | Q4 FY25-26 | Q3 FY25-26 | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | 18,362.80 | 18,016.90 | 1.92 |
| Expenses | 14,430.10 | 14,619.00 | -1.29 |
| Other Income | 786.10 | 1,028.40 | -23.56 |
| Operating Profit | 14,539.60 | 14,366.10 | 1.21 |
| Depreciation | 348.80 | 356.30 | -2.10 |
| Interest | 291.80 | 275.30 | 5.99 |
| Profit Before Tax | 4,078.20 | 3,794.70 | 7.47 |
| Tax | 1,041.10 | 1,012.50 | 2.82 |
| Net Profit | 3,037.10 | 2,782.20 | 9.16 |
| Action | Target Price (₹) | Broker | Date | Reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Not Found | ||||
Data not available.
| Company | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Month | 1 Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Not Found | ||||||
The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Wednesday quashed criminal proceedings against Wipro chairman Azim Premji and other senior company officials, initiated in connection with alleged violations of labour laws. The court also set aside the summons issued by a magistrate court in the matter. The order was passed by Justice Jafeer Ahmad on a petition filed by Premji and others. The case originated from a complaint filed by the labour department, alleging non-compliance with labour laws at Wipro's Ghaziabad office. Acting on the complaint, a local magistrate court issued a summons to Premji and a few other company officials, following which the order was challenged before the high court. In its judgment, the high court observed that in matters relating to technical violations of labour laws, top executives, such as a company chairman, cannot be held criminally liable unless there are specific allegations showing their direct involvement. The court noted that the complain
