Clear judge appointments quickly amid growing case backlog: SC to Centre

The Supreme Court today highlighted the alarming situation of over 7 lakh criminal appeals that are currently pending across various High Courts

Supreme Court, SC
The bench made the observation while hearing a suo motu case related to issues concerning the grant of bail
Md Zakariya Khan New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : May 08 2025 | 5:27 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed serious concern over the rising number of pending cases in High Courts due to unfilled judge vacancies and urged the Central government to act swiftly on the Collegium’s recommendations for judicial appointments.
 
According to a report by Live Law, in its order, the SC bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan observed, “The Central Government needs to ensure that the recommendations made by the Supreme Court collegium for judge appointments are cleared expeditiously.” 
 
The bench made the observation while hearing a suo motu case related to issues concerning the grant of bail.
 
The top court highlighted the alarming situation of over 7 lakh criminal appeals that are currently pending across various High Courts. This backlog, the SC indicated, is directly linked to the shortage of judges in several High Courts.
 
The bench provided detailed figures to underscore the crisis. The Allahabad High Court, which has the highest pendency of criminal appeals at over 2 lakh, is operating with only 79 judges, despite a sanctioned strength of 160. The Bombay High Court has just 60 judges against an approved strength of 94. In the Calcutta High Court, only 44 judges are working, while 72 posts have been sanctioned. Similarly, the Delhi High Court is functioning with only 36 judges, though it is allowed to have 60. 
 
The Court also referred to recent data published by the Supreme Court, which shows that 29 recommendations made by the Collegium since November 2022 remain pending with the Centre. Of these, 4 recommendations are from the year 2023, 13 from 2024, and 12 from 2025. In addition to these, several reiterated recommendations—names that were returned once by the Centre and then re-sent by the Collegium—also await approval.
 
The bench remarked, “We hope and trust that the pending proposals will be cleared by the central government at the earliest.”
 
The Supreme Court has long maintained that delays in appointments adversely impact the functioning of the judiciary. This latest observation adds to a series of reminders from the judiciary to the executive to address vacancies in the higher courts with urgency.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtHigh CourtBombay High CourtAllahabad High CourtBS Web Reportspending cases

First Published: May 08 2025 | 5:27 PM IST

Next Story