Delhi HC bans mandatory service charges, calls it 'unfair trade practice'

The Delhi High Court today ruled that restaurants and hotels cannot impose mandatory service charges, affirming the CCPA's guidelines that protect consumer rights and promote fairness

In a major change for the hospitality industry and in what could be a good news for diners, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council has decided to allow high-end hotels to choose between two indirect tax rates for restaurant services provided on the
The court pointed out that mandatory service charges mislead customers by making them believe they are paying a government tax or GST.
Nandini Singh New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 28 2025 | 4:40 PM IST
The Delhi High Court ruled on Friday that restaurants and hotels cannot impose mandatory service charges on food bills, stating that such a practice amounts to unfair trade.
 
The court upheld the guidelines issued by the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), which prohibit mandatory service charges and ensure that consumers have the right to decide whether to pay them, reported Bar and Bench.
 
Justice Prathiba M Singh, who delivered the verdict, dismissed petitions filed by restaurant associations challenging the CCPA’s guidelines. The court also imposed a penalty of ₹1 lakh on the associations for contesting the guidelines. 
 
Reaffirming the CCPA’s authority, the court stated that the body is not merely advisory but has the legal power to regulate unfair trade practices and protect consumer rights.
 
The CCPA issued its guidelines in 2022, explicitly stating: 
- Restaurants cannot add service charges automatically to food bills. 
- Service charge cannot be disguised under any other name. 
- Customers must be clearly informed that service charges are voluntary. 
- No restaurant or hotel can deny service based on whether a customer pays a service charge. 
- Service charges cannot be added to the total bill amount and subjected to GST.
 
Rejecting objections raised by restaurant groups, the High Court ruled, “The CCPA is an authority empowered to pass the guidelines under CPA 2019. Issuing guidelines is an essential function of the CCPA. The same has to be mandatorily complied with.”
 
Restaurant associations argued that the guidelines were arbitrary and could not be enforced as a government order. However, the court pointed out that mandatory service charges mislead customers by making them believe they are paying a government tax or GST.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Delhi High CourtService chargeBS Web Reports

First Published: Mar 28 2025 | 4:40 PM IST

Next Story