Delhi HC permits govt to withdraw plea against LG order in prosecutors row

The court passed the order after the Lieutenant Governor's counsel did not object to the plea

gavel law cases
Delhi High Court on Monday allowed the BJP-led government in the capital to withdraw a plea against Lieutenant Governor. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : May 19 2025 | 1:44 PM IST

The Delhi High Court on Monday allowed the BJP-led government in the capital to withdraw a plea against Lieutenant Governor allowing Delhi Police to choose special public prosecutors for February 2020 riots and 2021 Republic Day violence cases.

A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said, The application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn."  The court passed the order after the Lieutenant Governor's counsel did not object to the plea. 

ALSO READ: Delhi High Court dismisses RCB's plea against Uber ad with Travis Head

The erstwhile AAP government had challenged the LG's decision on the ground that it wouldn't be in the interest of a fair trial to have Delhi Police chosen lawyers as SPPs in cases of farmers' protests-related violence on January 26, 2021 and Delhi riots.

The appointment of special public prosecutors (SPP) was a routine matter and not an exceptional one requiring a reference to President and LG had "no sound reason" for referring the matter to President when the government had agreed to appoint independent SPPs, it said.

The previous government further argued SPPs were chosen by Delhi Police in "serious conflict of interest".

LG's order on the appointments came on July 23, 2021 which the former government alleged jeopardised fair trial as the SPPs were taking charge of the matters and displacing the regular public prosecutors.

The plea as a result sought an urgent court intervention.

LG's order invoked the proviso to Article 239-AA(4) of the Constitution in his reference to President which is still pending with President.

The government's plea also challenged the July 26, 2021 notification over the same aside from the Centre's August 4, 2021 order endorsing the LG's view and approving the appointments.

The appointments were contrary to established legal principles and violate the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial, it contended.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Delhi High CourtDelhi governmentRekha Gupta

First Published: May 19 2025 | 1:44 PM IST

Next Story